<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Piracy is just a business model	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.davidkaspar.com/archives/2006/10/piracy-is-just-a-business-model.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.davidkaspar.com/archives/2006/10/piracy-is-just-a-business-model.php</link>
	<description>Online journal and ponderings about the Internet, gadgets and photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Jansen		</title>
		<link>https://blog.davidkaspar.com/archives/2006/10/piracy-is-just-a-business-model.php#comment-1090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Jansen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidkaspar.com/wp/2006/10/12/piracy-is-just-a-business-model/#comment-1090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A lot of true words.
There is one big advantage of official released content: All the extras (making of, directors comments, ...) and of course the fact that I still think that the makers of the film should be awarded for their job.
The big disadvantage is that there are to many ...
It is silly that a movie comes out much later in Europe than in the US. In &#039;the old days&#039; there was a good reason for this. Making the movie reels costs a lot of money and time, these where photographically copied frame by frame - I even will not think of the amount of chemicals used in this process.
But in the digital era there is no excuse for this behaviour by the film makers. Movies are transmitted to Europe by satellite and there are even people who state it is possible to copy the movie from that download feed and more and more cinemas have true digital projectors. It is perfectly possible to have movies at the same  time in cinemas around the world.
Doing this will definitely reduce piracy. The (few) pirated movies that I have are mostly of Region 1 (US) DVDs - just because the DVD in the US is available before the movie is available in Europe and I do not want to wait for another few months.
But the biggest disadvantage of official releases is the amount of junk on the DVD. It is not uncommon that, after placing the DVD in the player, it takes up to a minute (I even clocked 110 seconds once) before you get to the menu - and this is not counting the time my DVD player needs to determine that a DVD was inserted: commercials for new movies (Disney does this all the time), a warning that states that copying or showing in publix is not allowed (in 10 different languages since we are in Europe) or the complex multi-level menu structures you have to go through before you can press &#039;Start&#039;.
On the (almost) &#039;illegal&#039; DVD players that allow multiple regions you can mostly skip this junk. But on a brand player (e.g. Philips or Sony) you cannot skip through these items and you have to see through all this.
With an &#039;official&#039; DVD you pay more for added frustrations :-}
And the biggest frustration I always get after about 6 month. The DVD cost me about 26 Euro (US $ 34) and now the movie is available on a newer DVD with extra making of, editors comments, deleted scenes or even better (DTS) sound for a lower price (19 Euro/$ 25). If you want a movie just after the release date it should be more expensive - that&#039;s OK, you pay to be the first one to own it. But then I also want to be the first to own all the newest features.
I collected the whole James Bond series, 20 DVDs for 20 Euro each. The movies were put on DVD &#039;as is&#039; with less colorful pictures and mono sound for the older pictures. But now there is a whole new set of DVDs available (12 Euro each) with restored picture quality and restored sound - even with DTS sound restored from the original audio materials. Better picture and sound quality for less money almost makes me think it is not that bad to copy movies once in a while ;-)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of true words.<br />
There is one big advantage of official released content: All the extras (making of, directors comments, &#8230;) and of course the fact that I still think that the makers of the film should be awarded for their job.<br />
The big disadvantage is that there are to many &#8230;<br />
It is silly that a movie comes out much later in Europe than in the US. In &#8216;the old days&#8217; there was a good reason for this. Making the movie reels costs a lot of money and time, these where photographically copied frame by frame &#8211; I even will not think of the amount of chemicals used in this process.<br />
But in the digital era there is no excuse for this behaviour by the film makers. Movies are transmitted to Europe by satellite and there are even people who state it is possible to copy the movie from that download feed and more and more cinemas have true digital projectors. It is perfectly possible to have movies at the same  time in cinemas around the world.<br />
Doing this will definitely reduce piracy. The (few) pirated movies that I have are mostly of Region 1 (US) DVDs &#8211; just because the DVD in the US is available before the movie is available in Europe and I do not want to wait for another few months.<br />
But the biggest disadvantage of official releases is the amount of junk on the DVD. It is not uncommon that, after placing the DVD in the player, it takes up to a minute (I even clocked 110 seconds once) before you get to the menu &#8211; and this is not counting the time my DVD player needs to determine that a DVD was inserted: commercials for new movies (Disney does this all the time), a warning that states that copying or showing in publix is not allowed (in 10 different languages since we are in Europe) or the complex multi-level menu structures you have to go through before you can press &#8216;Start&#8217;.<br />
On the (almost) &#8216;illegal&#8217; DVD players that allow multiple regions you can mostly skip this junk. But on a brand player (e.g. Philips or Sony) you cannot skip through these items and you have to see through all this.<br />
With an &#8216;official&#8217; DVD you pay more for added frustrations :-}<br />
And the biggest frustration I always get after about 6 month. The DVD cost me about 26 Euro (US $ 34) and now the movie is available on a newer DVD with extra making of, editors comments, deleted scenes or even better (DTS) sound for a lower price (19 Euro/$ 25). If you want a movie just after the release date it should be more expensive &#8211; that&#8217;s OK, you pay to be the first one to own it. But then I also want to be the first to own all the newest features.<br />
I collected the whole James Bond series, 20 DVDs for 20 Euro each. The movies were put on DVD &#8216;as is&#8217; with less colorful pictures and mono sound for the older pictures. But now there is a whole new set of DVDs available (12 Euro each) with restored picture quality and restored sound &#8211; even with DTS sound restored from the original audio materials. Better picture and sound quality for less money almost makes me think it is not that bad to copy movies once in a while 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: /&#124;\		</title>
		<link>https://blog.davidkaspar.com/archives/2006/10/piracy-is-just-a-business-model.php#comment-1089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[/&#124;\]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidkaspar.com/wp/2006/10/12/piracy-is-just-a-business-model/#comment-1089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Same thing applies for Windows vista. Check out the arguments at www.winsupersite.com. I thought that windows Vista would be the first Windows copy I would be willing to buy since Windows 3.0. But now Microsoft decided that PC enthusiasts will only be able to move their copy of Windows to another PC once.
Microsoft just lost me as a potential customer, and I&#039;ll be widely supporting any hack into Windows Vista to bypass such draconian and abusive enforcement.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same thing applies for Windows vista. Check out the arguments at <a href="http://www.winsupersite.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.winsupersite.com</a>. I thought that windows Vista would be the first Windows copy I would be willing to buy since Windows 3.0. But now Microsoft decided that PC enthusiasts will only be able to move their copy of Windows to another PC once.<br />
Microsoft just lost me as a potential customer, and I&#8217;ll be widely supporting any hack into Windows Vista to bypass such draconian and abusive enforcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
