<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Firefox 1.5 and Greasemonkey 0.6.4: where is my DOMParser	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.davidkaspar.com/archives/2005/12/firefox-1-5-and-greasemonkey-0-6-4-where-is-my-domparser.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.davidkaspar.com/archives/2005/12/firefox-1-5-and-greasemonkey-0-6-4-where-is-my-domparser.php</link>
	<description>Online journal and ponderings about the Internet, gadgets and photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:53:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim McCormack		</title>
		<link>https://blog.davidkaspar.com/archives/2005/12/firefox-1-5-and-greasemonkey-0-6-4-where-is-my-domparser.php#comment-1014</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim McCormack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidkaspar.com/wp/2005/12/02/firefox-1-5-and-greasemonkey-0-6-4-where-is-my-domparser/#comment-1014</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, any new information about the XPCNativeWrapper approach, and the security implications thereof?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, any new information about the XPCNativeWrapper approach, and the security implications thereof?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Johan Sundström		</title>
		<link>https://blog.davidkaspar.com/archives/2005/12/firefox-1-5-and-greasemonkey-0-6-4-where-is-my-domparser.php#comment-1013</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan Sundström]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidkaspar.com/wp/2005/12/02/firefox-1-5-and-greasemonkey-0-6-4-where-is-my-domparser/#comment-1013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interestingly, I manage quite fine to use DOMParser without jumping through all those hoops in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ecmanaut.blogspot.com/2006/03/mark-my-links.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Mark my links&lt;/a&gt; script I whipped together the last few days -- at least running Mozilla 1.5.0.1. Reports has it it doesn&#039;t work with 1.5.0, though, so your method may have slightly better portability.
&lt;blockquote&gt;David says:
Maybe Mozilla 1.5.0.1 again enabled the DOMParser?
It was specifically Firefox 1.5 for which many Greasemonkey scripts broke because DOMParser had been disabled.
I found the EX4 syntax very elegant but will try not use it because it is less portable.
Will check out your scripts later today.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, I manage quite fine to use DOMParser without jumping through all those hoops in the <a href="http://ecmanaut.blogspot.com/2006/03/mark-my-links.html" rel="nofollow ugc">Mark my links</a> script I whipped together the last few days &#8212; at least running Mozilla 1.5.0.1. Reports has it it doesn&#8217;t work with 1.5.0, though, so your method may have slightly better portability.</p>
<blockquote><p>David says:<br />
Maybe Mozilla 1.5.0.1 again enabled the DOMParser?<br />
It was specifically Firefox 1.5 for which many Greasemonkey scripts broke because DOMParser had been disabled.<br />
I found the EX4 syntax very elegant but will try not use it because it is less portable.<br />
Will check out your scripts later today.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
